These promotions will be applied to this item:
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer ¨C no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Colour:
-
-
-
- To view this video, download
The Masque of Africa: Glimpses of African Belief Kindle Edition
Âé¶¹Çø
The Masque of Africa is Nobel Prize-winning V. S. Naipaul's first major work of non-fiction to be published since his internationally bestselling Beyond Belief. Like all of Naipaul's great works of non-fiction, The Masque of Africa is superficially a book of travels ¡ª?full of people, stories and landscapes he visits?¡ª but it also encompasses a larger narrative and purpose: to judge the effects of belief (whether in indigenous animisms, faiths imposed by other cultures, or even the cults of leaders and mythical history) upon the progress of civilization.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherKnopf Canada
- Publication dateOct. 19 2010
- File size3.2 MB
Popular titles by this author
Product description
Review
A New York Times Book Review Editor¡¯s Choice
?
¡°You don¡¯t have to agree with Naipaul, or find his point of view pleasant, to acknowledge his powers of observation and storytelling. Both friends and foes will find much to be moved by in this work.¡±
¡ªAlexandra Fuller, The Globe and Mail
?
¡°Naipaul is willing to express a new attitude, one of self-doubt. This acknowledgment of human frailty¡ªstarting with his own¡ªbroadens his observational powers immeasurably.¡±
¡ªThe New York Times Book Review
¡°This beautiful and humane book . . . achieves a kind of majesty.¡±
¡ªHarper¡¯s Magazine
?
¡°Engaging work. . . . Naipaul¡¯s prose remains smooth, subtle, often silvery.¡±
¡ªKirkus Reviews
?
¡°Ever fair-minded, soberly reflective and conciliatory, Naipaul offers his sage observations in the hope that by learning more, we accept greater.¡±
¡ªPublishers Weekly (starred review)
?
¡°A sharply written and engrossing exploration.¡±
¡ªLibrary Journal
About the Author
Excerpt. ? Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Tomb at Kasubi
?
?
I spent eight to nine months in East Africa in 1966. A month in Tanzania; six weeks or so in the Kenya Highlands; the rest of the time in Uganda. Some years later I even used a version of Uganda in a piece of fiction; you can do that only when you feel you have a fair idea of a place, or an idea sufficient for your needs. Forty-two years after that first visit I went back to Uganda. I was hoping to get started there on this book about the nature of African belief, and I thought it would be better to ease myself into my subject in a country I knew or half knew. But I found the place eluding me.
?
I had gone to Uganda in 1966 to be a writer in residence at Makerere University in Kampala, the capital. I lived in a little grey bungalow on the campus, which was spacious and open and well-tended, with asphalted roads with kerbstones, and watchmen at the barred entrance. My allowance (provided by an American foundation) was enough to give me a driver and a cook. My duties weren¡¯t too well defined, and I was living more or less privately, absorbed in a book I had brought with me, working hard on it every day, and paying less attention to Africa and the students at Makerere than I should have done. When I wanted some relief from the book and the campus, I would drive the fifteen or so miles to Entebbe, where the airport was and where, on the edge of Lake Victoria, which was very grand, the largest lake in Africa, there was also (as there was in other British colonial towns) a Botanical Garden, pleasant to walk in. Sometimes (a reminder of the wildness by which we were surrounded, but from which we were protected) the ground of the Garden was flooded in parts by water from the Lake seeping through.
?
The drive from Kampala to Entebbe was a drive through country; that was part of its restfulness in 1966. It was different now. You could see from the air, as the plane landed, how Entebbe itself had grown, with more than a scattering of villages or settlements far and wide on the damp green ground below the heavy grey clouds of the rainy season; and you understood that what was once bush in an unimportant area of a small colony had become valuable building land. The shiny new corrugated-iron roofs gave you the feeling that in spite of the bad recent past, forty years as bad as anything in Africa¡ªmurderous tyranny followed by war and little wars¡ªthere might be a money frenzy down there now.
?
The drive to the capital was no longer a drive through country. Once you got past the old administrative and residential buildings of colonial Entebbe, still somehow surviving (red corrugated-iron roofs and white-painted bargeboards still in good order), you found yourself in an improvised semi-urban development, flimsy-looking, where many of the buildings that had been put up (groceries, garages, flats) seemed only waiting to be pulled down, and in the meantime were bright, and repetitive, with painted walls advertising mobile phones.
?
It was like that all the way to the capital. There was no view at some stage of the city and the green hills for which Kampala used to be famous. All those hills were now built over; and many of the spaces between the hills, the dips, were seemingly floored over with the old corrugated iron of poor dwellings. But with all these dwellings there had come money and cars and, for people who didn¡¯t have the money, the boda-bodas, the bicycles and motorbikes that for a small sum offered you a fast pillion-ride through the stalled traffic, a pillion-ride which in colonial days might have been illegal. The roads couldn¡¯t deal with the traffic; even in this rainy season the roads were dusty, scuffed down beyond the asphalt to the fertile red earth of Uganda. I couldn¡¯t recognise this Kampala, and even at this early stage it seemed to me that I was in a place where a calamity had occurred.
?
Later I got the figures for population. They told the story. In 1966 there were about five million people in Uganda. Now¡ªin spite of the rule between 1971 and 1979 of Idi Amin (who was said to have killed 150,000) and the comparable rule between 1981 and 1985 of the feral Milton Obote, who liked his hair to slope up high from the parting, in a version of the style known here as the English style; in spite of those two, and all the subsequent little wars, still going on after forty years (a million and a half people said to be displaced in the north); and in spite of the AIDS epidemic¡ªthere were between thirty and thirty-four million people in Uganda. As though Nature, going against logic, wished to outdo itself, to make up for the blood Uganda had lost and didn¡¯t want the little country and its great suffering to fade away.
?
There was a mosque or church at the top of every hill, and major ecclesiastical buildings everywhere else. All the Christian denominations were represented. And in the over-built-up poorer areas there were simpler ¡°born-again¡± Christian structures, sometimes fancifully named, with signboards: as though religion here was like a business that met a desperate consumer need at all levels. There were competing mosques of various sorts, Sunni, Shia, Ismaili; the Ismaili community, considered heretical by some, was powerful in East Africa. There was even a mosque and a school of the Ahmadiya sect, which honoured a nineteenth-century Indian-born prophet of Islam and was not accepted by all Muslims. To add to the mix, Brother Leader Ghaddafi of Libya was due in a few days, with his stylish clothes and dark glasses, and with his famous female bodyguard (in addition to his two hundred security men), to open a very big Libyan mosque on a prominent hill site in old Kampala. In the commercial area of the town there were two newish Indian stone temples near the Indian places of business. The Indians had been invited back after their expulsion by Amin; and they had come back to an ambiguous welcome: a local paper was wondering whether they had been compensated twice, and asking its readers to comment. So the red flags flew on the stone temples, to say that the temples were in use.
?
Until the 1840s Uganda had been isolated, living with itself. Then Arab traders had arrived from the east. They wanted slaves and ivory; in return they gave cheap guns and what in effect were toys. The Kabaka Sunna, known for his great cruelty, had welcomed the Arabs. He liked their toys. He especially liked the mirrors; he had never seen his face before, and couldn¡¯t get over it. It was Sunna¡¯s son and successor, Mutesa, who in 1861-2 met and entertained and for some months frustrated the explorer John Hanning Speke, who was within days of discovering the source of the Nile.
?
Mutesa was only twenty-five, almost as cruel as his father, but at the same time outward-looking, a man of intuition and intelligence. He liked the guns he got from Speke; he liked the compass and other instruments he saw Speke using. But Mutesa¡¯s Baganda people, with their gift for social organisation, their military discipline, and their elaborate court ritual, evolved over some centuries, had a civilisation of their own. They built roads as straight as Roman roads; they had a high idea of sanitation; they had a fleet on Lake Victoria, with an admiral and naval techniques of their own, and they could launch invasions of Busoga across the Nile. They worked iron and made their own spears and knives; they knew how to make bark-cloth and were beautiful builders of grass houses¡ªwith roofs as neatly trimmed as though by a London tailor, Speke thought. Knowing that his people could do all these things, Mutesa arrived, quite marvellously, at the idea that the true difference between himself and Speke, very much a Victorian Christian, always ready to preach to the heathen, was philosophical and religious. Mutesa turned against Islam, which he had partly adopted; he said the Arabs were liars; and thirteen years later, when he met the explorer H. M. Stanley, he asked his help in getting English missionaries to come to Uganda.
?
The fruit of that decision of a hundred and thirty years before could now be seen in Kampala. Foreign religion, to go by the competing ecclesiastical buildings on the hilltops, was like an applied and contagious illness, curing nothing, giving no final answers, keeping everyone in a state of nerves, fighting wrong battles, narrowing the mind. And it was possible to wonder whether Mutesa himself, if he could come back, mightn¡¯t have thought that he had made a mistake, and that Africa, left to itself in this matter, might have arrived at its own more valuable synthesis of old and new.
?
Why had the foreign-revealed religions wrought such havoc with African belief ? These foreign religions had a difficult theology; I didn¡¯t think it would have been easy, starting from scratch, to put it across to someone here. I asked Prince Kassim. He was a direct descendant of Mutesa, but on the Islamic side, a family division that reflected Mutesa¡¯s early half-conversion to Islam. The prince said I was wrong. Both Christianity and Islam would have been attractive to Africans for a simple reason. They both offered an afterlife; gave people a vision of themselves living on after death. African religion, on the other hand, was more airy, offering only the world of spirits, and the ancestors.
Product details
- ASIN : B00472OBRU
- Publisher : Knopf Canada
- Accessibility : Learn more
- Publication date : Oct. 19 2010
- Language : English
- File size : 3.2 MB
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Not Enabled
- Print length : 256 pages
- ISBN-13 : 978-0307399977
- Page Flip : Enabled
- Âé¶¹Çø Rank: #339,594 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #87 in African Travel
- #346 in African History (Kindle Store)
- #390 in Africa Travel Guides
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author¡¯s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in Canada on October 27, 2018Verified PurchaseNaipaul, in this fascinating book, explores the deep underbelly of modern Africa. An honest account written as if by an an anthropologist. It resonated with my own childhood and youth.
- Reviewed in Canada on December 2, 2011Underlying the spontaneous reporting we can detect Naipaul's careful preparation. His visits to religious leaders are set up through a grapevine of contacts. He arrives as a visiting head of the literary world, escorted by local officials of various kinds. He tries to observe protocol carefully, like he was calling on royals in Europe. During his first visits in Uganda and Nigeria, Naipaul seems to accept that African religion revolves around the old cults of kings and tribal leaders. Then he branches out to explore popular religion as a relationship with nature or a means of influencing personal fate. The trip through Gabon shows an especially appealing side of African natural religion. And the trip to South Africa shows folk religion at its most disoriented and grasping. Through it all, Naipaul pays attention to how people regard animals. He feels it is an important barometer of their humanity.
Top reviews from other countries
-
ganase indraReviewed in France on August 7, 2017
3.0 out of 5 stars L'Afrique mes souvenirs
Verified PurchaseJe trouve sa description de la vie actuelle dans ce sens pays sont parfois trop n¨¦gatif et injuste, mais pour moi qui connaissit bien ces pays auparavant , cela me rappelle des bons souvenirs.
-
August PartyReviewed in Japan on November 12, 2010
2.0 out of 5 stars ¤µ¤è¤Ê¤é¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë£¡
Verified Purchase¡¡ËĶþÄê¤Ö¤ê¤Ë¥«¥ó¥Ñ¥é¤ò·Ã¤Í¤ë¤È¤³¤í¤«¤é¤³¤Î±¾(2010Ä꿯)¤Ïʼ¤Þ¤ë¡£Ç°¤Ë¤³¤³¤Ç½Ìʦ¤ò¤·¤Æ¤¤¤¿Ê±¤Ï¡¢×Ô·Ö¤ÎСÕh¤òÊ餯¤³¤È¤«¤éÍ·¤¬Àë¤ì¤º(¡º×ÔÓɤιú¤Ç¡»¤«¤âÖª¤ì¤Ê¤¤)¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«¤ä¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«¤ÎÈË¡©¤Ø¤ÎévÐĤϤ¢¤Þ¤ê¤Ê¤«¤Ã¤¿¤Î¤À¤ÈÊ餯¡£Ôٷä·¤¿ÍÁµØ¤Ï³¢¤Æ¤ÎÃæÓ°¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢¤Þ¤¿¤³¤ÎÍÁµØ¤ËÀ´¤ë¤«¤âÖª¤ì¤Ê¤¤¤È˼¤¤¤Ê¤¬¤éÖ²ÎïÔ°¤ÇÂò¤Ã¤¿¥Á¥å©`¥ê¥Ã¥×?¥Ä¥ê©`(?)¤ÎÃ群òÖ²¤¨¤¿¤³¤È¤ò»ØÏ뤹¤ë¡£¥¢¥ß¥ó¤Ë¤è¤ë±¯²Ò¤ò˼¤¤¤Ê¤¬¤é¡¢¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«¤ÎÈË¡©¤ÎÐÅÑö¤Î¤¢¤ê·½¤Ë(¥¤¥¹¥é¥à¤ä¥¥ê¥¹¥È½Ì¤Îµ½À´ÒÔǰ¤«¤é¤¢¤ë¥×¥ê¥ß¥Æ¥£¥Ö¤ÊÐÅÑö)¡¢šsÊ·µÄ¤Ê´óŰɱ¤òÓÕÒý¤·¤Æ¤·¤Þ¤¦Ó°¤ò¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤Ï¼û¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤è¤¦¤Ë¤âÊܤ±È¡¤ì¤ë¡£
¡¡¥¦¥¬¥ó¥À¤«¤éʼ¤á¤¿Âäϡ¢Î÷¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«¤Ø¤È¾A¤¯¡£¥Ê¥¤¥¸¥§¥ê¥¢¤Î¥é¥´¥¹¤Î¿Õ¸Û¤Î»ìÂÒ¤Ö¤ê¤ò¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤ÏÓï¤ë¡£¤¤¤è¤¤¤è¥Ý¥¹¥È¥³¥í¥Ë¥¢¥ëÉç»á¤Ø¤Î¿ÁÁ¢¤Á?²»ÐÅ?Ť꤬¼«µã¤Ë´ï¤·¤¤¤Ä¤â¤Î¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë½Ú¤¬Ê¼¤Þ¤ë¤Ï¤¸¤Þ¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤«¤ÈÆÚ´ý¤·¤Æ¤¤¤¿¤Î¤À¤¬¡¢¤É¤¦¤â¤½¤¦¤¤¤¦·½¤Ø¤ÏÐФ«¤Ê¤¤¡£³¢¤Æ¤ÎŤì¤ë¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤Ï¤É¤³¤ËÐФäƤ·¤Þ¤Ã¤¿¤Î¤À¤í¤¦¡£¤à¤·¤í¼«¶È¤ÎƶÀ§¤«¤é¿àѧ¤·¤Ê¤¬¤é»á¼ÆÑ§¤òѧ¤ÓÉç»áµÄµØÎ»¤òµÃ¤ë¤Þ¤Ç¤Ëµ½¤Ã¤¿¤¢¤ë¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«ÈˤΰëÉú¤¬¡¢¤¢¤ëÖÖ¤Î×ð¾´¤ò½»¤¨¤ÆÓï¤é¤ì¤Æ¤æ¤¯¤Î¤À¡£¤¢¤ë¤¤¤Ï¡¢¤¤ï¤á¤ÆÐËζÉ¥Ï©`¥ì¥à¤ÎÅ®ÐÔ¤«¤é¤ÎÎŤÓï¤ê¤Ë¤·¤Æ¤â¡¢’Q¤¤¤«¤¿¤ÏÆ«¼û¤òÅŤ·¤¿È˼äÐÔ¤ËÀï´ò¤Á¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Æ¡¢ºÎ¤ÈÑÔ¤¦¤«¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤Î¶¾¤ÏÍêÈ«¤ËÏû¤¨Ê§¤»¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢²¶¤é¤¨¤¿¥Ô¥°¥ß©`¤ò¥Ú¥Ã¥È¤È¤·¤ÆËùÓФ·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«ÈˤÎÎŤÊ餤ˤ·¤Æ¤â¡¢È˼ä¤ò¥Ú¥Ã¥È¤È¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤Ø¤Î¥¢¥Õ¥ê¥«ÈˤÎ霤ˤĤ¤¤ÆºÎ¤Î¶´²ì¤âʾ¤µ¤ì¤º¡¢¤¿¤ÀÎŤÁ÷¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë·ç¤Ê¤Î¤À¡£???³¢¤Æ¤Î¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤ËŨÃܤˤ¢¤Ã¤¿¶¾¤Ïʧ¤»¡¢ÎÄÕ¤ÏÝX¤¯(¤³¤ì¤â¤¹¤´¤¯šÝ¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤¿)¡¢¤â¤¦ƒW¤Ï¥Ê¥¤¥Ý©`¥ë¤ÎФ·¤¤±¾¤òÕi¤à¤³¤È¤Ï¤Ê¤¤¤À¤í¤¦¡¢¤È˼¤¦¡£
- GioReviewed in the United States on October 23, 2010
5.0 out of 5 stars Mumbo Jumbo Revisited
Verified PurchaseIn popular parlance, "mumbo jumbo" is a pejorative label for unintelligible technical language and/or for absurd magical blather. It's a useful term for discussing neoliberal economic theories, such as those of assorted Republican contenders for the role of heir-apparent. In V.S. Naipaul's latest travelogue, The Masque of Africa, Mumbo-Jumbo is a specific, recognizable supernatural personage, a vaguely menacing figure reminiscent of the Norse Loki or the Native American Coyote. The book is replete with such intriguingly 'fresh' details, traveler's snapshots of the quaint and curious. If you expect more than traveler's observation, I warn you, you've chosen the wrong book. Naipaul is quite forthright in subtitling his newest book as "GLIMPSES of African Belief." He's not a sociologist, not a historian, not in fact a scholarly writer of any sort; he's an intellectual tourist with an immense talent for turning his glimpses into delightful prose. Occasionally those glimpses are startlingly thought-provoking, but as a traveler, Naipaul is far more adept at asking questions and noticing anomalies than at systematic analyses. That has always been true of his travelogues, though his two books about journeys in Islam were tougher-minded than this book about a jaunt in Africa.
Naipaul makes his agenda plain: "... the theme of The Masque of Africa is African belief. I begin in Uganda, at the center of the continent, do Ghana and Nigeria, the Ivory Coast and Gabon, and end at the bottom of the continent in South Africa. My theme is belief, not political or economical life; and yet at the bottom of the continent the political realities are so overwhelming that they have to be taken into account." Whoa, Vidiadhar Sahib, that's quite an itinerary! It reminds me of the old joke about the American tourist in Europe: if today is Tuesday, this must be Belgium. But Naipaul has no intention of trying to be thorough or comprehensive; much as his writings have always wrestled with issues of 'belief', in Africa he is honestly a kind of bird watcher, peering through his verbal binoculars hither and yon, hoping to spot something randomly significant. Don't suppose that I'm scorning his method here! I relished this book a lot for its literary mastery, and I found it to be a more 'realistic' depiction of Africa as a place, more accurately descriptive than the bulk of books I've read about the continent as I've seen it myself on a few very short visits.
In his chapter about Nigeria, Naipaul writes: "I had a romantic idea of the earth religions. I felt they took us back to the beginning, a philosophical big bang, and I cherished them for that reason. I thought they had a kind of beauty. But the past here still lived. People like the contractor [one of Naipaul's Nigerian informants] were closer to it, and his words ... gave a new idea: the dark abyss of paganism. Others spoke of that as well, in their own way; and it seemed to me that people near the bottom, who responded more instinctively to things, had the greater fear. The fear was real, not affected, and I felt it was this, rather than ideas of beauty and history and culture... that was keeping the past and all the old gods close." Aha! A 'romantic idea' indeed, or else an astonishing naivete for a Nobel Prize winner! But my nose tells me that Naipaul is being disingenuous, setting himself up as his own straw man. He does that a lot in this book. Plays 'straight man' to his own sardonic self. In fact, he invents an image of himself as a casual traveler careful of his health and his budget, almost a knapsack wanderer. Don't fall for that! He's a renowned author of thirty books, including several best sellers. With his royalties and his Nobel winnings, he really doesn't need to be cautious about overpaying a taxi driver. And he doesn't just 'arrive' anywhere unannounced; his contacts are all in place and his introductions come from the highest levels. If he chooses to impress the reader with the risks involved in visiting a slum or a backwoods shrine, it's only for literary effect. He is, please remember, a very famous and recognizable man in his late seventies, and no African government would risk allowing a mishap to him.
So why? Naipaul is a born poseur whose whole career has been based on fictionalizing himself. Whether you find his poses charming or annoying will depend on you. There are honorable people in this world who despise Naipaul's aloof, judgmental objectivity. He has been lambasted by both liberals and conservatives, usually for NOT taking sides. My impression of him is that he cherishes or at least relishes individual human beings but dislikes the species at large. He has made his distaste for the two "world religions" of Islam and Christianity fiercely explicit, a stance not calculated to make him beloved. In his glimpses of Africa, he is obviously disposed to perceive the worst effects of missionary imperialism from either world religion. He declares: "Perhaps an unspoken aspect of my inquiry was the possibility of the subversion of old Africa by the ways of the outside world."
What! Unspoken? More disingenuousness! Isn't it clear, Viadadhar my friend, that you deeply believe Africa would be a happier place if "we" had left it alone? And in that, I wouldn't disagree.
Honestly, Naipaul is far more distressed about the destruction of the forests and the decimation of wildlife than he is about the 'saving of souls' or the dependency of the global economy on African resources. Still, whether you share his values or not, you won't be bored as a reader by his subtle exposition of them.
The title of this book deserves some scrutiny. "Masque" is not a quaint British spelling of "mask", nor a synonym. It's a verb in one sense, meaning 'to wear a mask'. It's also a genre of musical theater, popular in aristocratic circles in 17th C England, an entertainment for the Elite often performed by the Elite themselves. Both senses are pertinent to Naipaul's book. Again and again, as part of his elite itinerary, Naipaul is shown spectacles of African pagan 'superstition' and ritual, some of them in full regalia, staged for him and for more ordinary tourists. And he enjoys the show. I imagine you and I would, also. A large share of the book is devoted to Naipaul's conversations with his informants from various social classes, his drivers, his hotel servants, his hired guides, but also several extremely protected elites, people like Winnie Mandela, Jerry Rawlings, and the presidents of various banks, who would not be accessible except as part of the Masque. Naipaul seldom reveals his stage machinery, seldom discloses how his contacts were prearranged. He's a sly impresario, this masquer from Trinidad!
I don't imagine that everyone will be satisfied with Naipaul's stance in this book. Those with the most earnest humanitarian concerns and those with the staunchest political opinions will probably accuse him of dilettantish trivialization. Let me say it plainly: this is an entertainment, a masque as artificial as Henry Purcell's "Fairy Queen". If it also stimulates insights, that's "valued added".
-
HansBlogReviewed in Germany on January 25, 2012
2.0 out of 5 stars Von hungernden K?tzlein
Verified PurchaseImmer wieder bemitleidet Vidiadhar Suraj Naipaul hungernde K?tzlein; der Flughafen in Lagos ist chaotisch, das Hotel dann nicht viel besser. T.i.A., aber Naipaul beklagt unerm¨¹dlich ¨¹ber hunderte Seiten den M¨¹ll in den Stra?en, die Staus, die leidenden Tiere und wie die Afrikaner das wei?e Erbe herunterwirtschaften.
Mit derlei Kleinkram h?lt sich der Gro?meister auf - in einem Buch, das deutlich abf?llt gegen viele seiner fr¨¹heren Reiseberichte und Romane: The Masque of Africa liefert bestenfalls mittelm??ige Informationen in dito Prosa (mit zahlreichen gelehrten Vokabeln, die meine Offline-W?rterb¨¹cher nicht kannten; ich hatte die englische Ausgabe). Atmosph?re-Beiwert: Null. Der Nobelpreistr?ger h?tte das saft- und kraftlose Buch vielleicht gar nicht ver?ffentlichen sollen. Mit welchem Gef¨¹hl brachten es die Lektoren wohl heraus? Ich glaube, sie sind fr¨¹h dar¨¹ber eingeschlafen: schon auf Seite 23 (Picador-TB-Ausgabe) fliegen die Begriffe Busoga und Wasoga durcheinander; Tippfehler ziehen sich durchs Buch; der R¨¹ckumschlag verwechselt "continent" und "country".
Viel echtes Leben schildert Naipaul nicht in seinen Berichten aus Uganda, Nigeria, Ghana, Gabon, S¨¹dafrika und der Elfenbeink¨¹ste. Die meiste Zeit verbringt er jeweils in der Hauptstadt, in Nigeria und Ghana auch ein paar Tage in der jeweils zweiten Stadt, in Gabon gibt es einen Ausflug in die Provinz. Er kommt kaum mal l?nger in ein Dorf.
In Uganda besichtigt Naipaul alte Schreine und Tempel, referiert Gelesenes und f?hrt, von Fliegen bel?stigt, zu einem Schimpansenreservat; in Nigeria besucht Naipaul Provinzf¨¹rsten, in Ghana einen Heiler und Ex-Premier Jerry Rawlings, der mit ausnahmsweise gut gen?hrten Haustieren punktet. In der Elfenbeink¨¹ste berichtet Naipaul von alten Zeiten und vom Katzen-Verzehr, und in Gabon unterh?lt er sich mit Pygm?enforschern, ohne selber Pygm?en zu treffen (oder diesen Mangel auch nur zu erkl?ren). Naipaul verl?sst sich immer wieder ganz auf das, was ein paar F¨¹hrer und Verbindungsleute berichten oder bestenfalls pr?sentieren, ohne selbst medias in res zu gehen (viele Initiationsrituale sind freilich streng geheim). Der Islam spielt nur in Nordnigeria eine Rolle.
Der fr¨¹he Naipaul schrieb zauberhaft humorvolle Romane, meist ¨¹ber seine Heimat Trinidad; dann folgten starke Reiseberichte aus Indien und aus dem nicht-arabischen Islam sowie bezwingende Afrika-Romane wie In a Free State, A Bend in the River und Half a Life. Dazwischen gab es schon ?fter mal K?se; aber Masque of Africa scheitert nicht mal mit Niveau. Der 76j?hrige Naipaul l?sst sich m¨¹de von Gew?hrsleuten durch afrikanische Tempel, Heilerst?tten und Dorfh?uptlingssalons leiten, spricht bequem mit Informanten der Oberklasse, bedauert K?tzlein und andere geplagte Gesch?pfe.
Das letzte Kapitel ¨¹ber S¨¹dafrika wirkt besonders blass. Der Leser bekommt nicht das Gef¨¹hl, ¨¹berhaupt einen Fu? ins Land gesetzt zu haben. Es gibt eine kurze, uninteressante Begegnung mit Winnie Mandela, einen Besuch auf dem Fetischmarkt, vor allem aber erz?hlt Naipaul von Ghandi in S¨¹dafrika und referiert gedehnt mehrere Erz?hlungen s¨¹dafrikanischer Autoren. Das Buch endet denkbar lieblos mit der Nacherz?hlung einer Erz?hlung, ohne jeden abrundenden Satz; The Independent: "His hands are shaky, his words no longer perfectly sculpted. The power over readers is dissipating."
- TED KAZReviewed in the United States on August 10, 2015
4.0 out of 5 stars It's quite an interesting juxtaposition of topic matter which this avid reader on all things Africa loved! It read a bit slow at
Verified PurchaseA very well written book which gets inside African history, politics, religion, and spirituality. It's quite an interesting juxtaposition of topic matter which this avid reader on all things Africa loved! It read a bit slow at times but a great read overall.