These promotions will be applied to this item:
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Colour:
-
-
-
- To view this video, download
B-25 Mitchell vs Japanese Destroyer: Battle of the Bismarck Sea 1943 (Duel Book 116) Kindle Edition
鶹
Over the first two months of 1943, squadrons perfected these tactics. Then, in early March, Japan tried to reinforce their garrison in Lae, New Guinea, with a 16-ship convoy – eight transports guarded by eight destroyers. The Fifth Air Force pounced on the convoy in the Bismarck Sea. By March 5 all eight transports and four destroyers had been sunk
This volume examines the mechanics of skip-bombing combined with a strafing B-25, assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the combatants (B-25 versus destroyer), and revealing the results of the attacks and the reasons why these USAAF tactics were so successful.
- Print length80 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherOsprey Publishing
- Publication dateDec 23 2021
- File size29.1 MB
Shop this series
See full series- Kindle Price:$60.62-
- Kindle Price:$96.44-
- Kindle Price:$185.99-
- Kindle Price:$948.27-
- Kindle Price:$924.71-
- Kindle Price:$313.54-
Shop this series
This option includes 3 books.
This option includes 5 books.
This option includes 10 books.
This option includes 48 books.
This option includes 50 books.
This option includes 17 books.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product description
About the Author
Mark Lardas, educated as a naval architect, worked for more than 30 years as an engineer, space navigator, and technical writer in the space, aviation, and energy industries. He has an abiding interest in aerospace, maritime, naval, and military history, with an emphasis on ship construction and engineering from the ninth to the twenty-first centuries. He is the author of more than 24 published books on these subjects. Mark lives and works in League City, Texas.
Jim Laurier is a native of New England and lives in New Hampshire. He attended Paier School of Art in Hamden, Connecticut, from 1974–78, and since graduating with Honors, he has been working professionally in the field of Fine Art and Illustration. He has been commissioned to paint for the US Air Force and has aviation paintings on permanent display at the Pentagon. Gareth Hector is a digital artist of international standing as well as an aviation history enthusiast. Gareth completed the battlescene and cover artwork in this title. He lives in Perthshire, UK.
Product details
- ASIN : B09Z83CMNP
- Publisher : Osprey Publishing
- Accessibility : Learn more
- Publication date : Dec 23 2021
- Edition : 1st
- Language : English
- File size : 29.1 MB
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 80 pages
- ISBN-13 : 978-1472845184
- Page Flip : Enabled
- Part of series : Duel
- 鶹 Rank: #930 in History of World War II
- #1,350 in Military Aviation History (Books)
- #1,813 in Japanese History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in Canada on February 19, 2025I've always been a fan of "asymmetric" pairings for Osprey's Duel series because they are usually more interesting, and while the overall result is satisfactory, it is let down a bit by the usual Osprey quality checking errors. Overall provides a very comprehensive overview of the the Battle of Bismarck Sea, examining the origins and development of the B-25 and Japanese destroyers (DD), the reasons skip bombing tactics and strafing B-25s were developed, and the strategic situation leading up to the battle. All very standard for an Osprey Duel title, and overall well done. Obviously the B-25 is a more focused topic than Japanese destroyers in general (given that there were 3 different classes of those present at Bismarck Sea), but Mark Lardas gives a basic overview of the doctrine and developmental history leading to the IJN destroyers being built the way they are. However, there are a bunch of (admittedly rather minor) proofreading errors concerning the IJN side that annoyed me:
On p.17, the text claims the previous generation (before the Fubuki class) of IJN DDs had dual-purpose main guns. This likely refers to the Minekaze, Wakatake, Mutsuki classes (roughly analogous to the US four piper prewar destroyers), which they definitely did not have dual-purpose main guns, being stuck with old shielded mounts for the whole Pacific War (the only AA upgrades they got was the usual smattering of 25mm). I'm not exactly sure where this claim comes from, as the only relevant end of book sources (Osprey's own The Imperial Japanese Navy in the Pacific War by Mark Stille and Evans and Peattie's Kaigun) definitely does not support this. I did find a claim from Combined Fleet (famous English language resource on IJN), but this does not seem to be substantiated anywhere else from what I can tell (even Japanese-language basic internet sources).
On p.19, the line drawing for Shirayuki has quadruple torpedo tubes, which no Fubuki-class never had at any point. Only the Asashio class and later had those (except the Shimakaze).
On p. 32-33, the text claims the Asashio-class has 4 boilers like the Fubuki-class, while on page 33 the table describes the Asashio class having 3 boilers (like the Kagero-class). The table is correct.
On p.39, the effective and maximum ranges for the 25mm and 13mm AA guns are swapped.
A final nitpick is for the battlescene art spread (showing an IJN 13mm gun mount in action) on pages 36-37. While I agree art is subjective, and I kind of get the effect artist Jim Laurier was trying to do here, the "half-focused, half out-of-focus" just looks odd. The kapok lifejacket of the IJN sailors just look very obviously photoshopped on. I find it disappointing because the cover art is on the other hand fantastic, and a better-looking battlescene art would've been pretty cool as there just aren't many pictures of IJN shipboard AA mounts in action compared to USN ones.
4 Stars; Recommended especially if you've never heard of the Battle of Bismarck Sea or skip bombing tactics or strafer-modified B-25s:
-This is a 80 page lavishly illustrated booklet, so adjust your expectations accordingly (it is rather comprehensive look on a focused topic though, so I wouldn't pick up another book on the same subject)
-As with most Osprey titles, I personally find the price point to be a bit high, but usually a worthwhile purchase if can be obtained at >30% off
Top reviews from other countries
-
Cliente 鶹Reviewed in Spain on January 19, 2022
4.0 out of 5 stars Sorprendente, buenos libros militares, buena información
Verified PurchaseOsprey siempre aporta datos precisos y poco conocidos
- A. MURRAYReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 30, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars not at it's best
Verified Purchasethe b-25 was from this book was not the best plane but was under used but it did it;s job i think well the guns in the front were heavy and would rip any thing in it's path to shreads i like these books
- Ned BarnettReviewed in the United States on January 31, 2023
5.0 out of 5 stars Superb analysis of capable foes
Verified PurchaseReally well-written and comprehensive study of a frequent head-to-head battle between USAAF B-25Mitchell medium bombers converted to something they were never designed for - low-level anti-ship assault aircraft, vs. IJN destroyers designed for something else - night torpedo attack. America proved its aircraft and crews were infinitely adaptable, while Japan never figured out how to turn a night torpedo attacker into a close-in AA vessel, with tragic (for them) results.
Part of Japan's problem was lousy shipboard AA guns. Their five inchers were no match for our 5'38s in the AA role, and lacked our radar control. Their 25mm were based on a French design, which explains why they were no good ... since everybody else opted for Swiss Oerlikons, why Japan stayed with the weak French design is beyond me. Andvtgeir triple mount was hard to reload in combat ...
Worse, they had nothing in the 40mm caliber, while both sides in Europe and all the allies in the Pacific used the 40mm Swedish Bofors guns, which had real stopping power and decent range. Of course, Japan's (if they had them) would have had no radar control, but still, an uncontrolled quad or even a twin 40mm Bofors would have been infinitely better than uncontrolled 25mm guns in triple mounts.
This was war to the knife, 1943-45, and this book really captures it. Highly recommended!